Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:43

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Were any US Generals hurt or killed yesterday in Damascus, Syria, yesterday 5/9/24?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What are the most common signs that a partner will cheat before it happens?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Report: Broncos are signing running back J.K. Dobbins to a one-year deal - Mile High Report
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sam Burns leads US Open with 65 and avoids calamity at Oakmont - AP News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Do most men prefer curvy women or skinny women?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is one thing which you cannot stop however hard you try?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Practice Report: Takeaways From Start of Second Week of OTAs - Baltimore Ravens